Hi Ian,

Thanks for the reply..

tried mewebmail.localhost and still nothing happens when trying to create a folder in webmail...
i fail to see why being able to do everything in webmail, but NOT create a folder relates to a firewall problem?

so.. the problem still exists..

Hello.. In webmail, right mouse on a mailbox or folder and selecting 'create folder' does exactly nothing.. no popup or no new folder.. just nothing.. tried on laptops en ipad, with chrome and edge.. but.. nothing.. also tried multiple different accounts, all with the same result.. using 'new folder...

As a non native english speaker i struggle what the 'dismiss' button at the system messages will do.. does it clear the temporary block from the IP address listed and dismissed? if so.. is it just 'dismissed' once? (so it can be blocked again in the future).. or can i only unblock these ip addresses...

no one?

in addition; all the other domains DNS MX records point to the same mailserver domain.. (like @ MX 10 mail.[mailserver].com)
so should they all have individual DKIM keys? of would the domain of the mailserver suffice?

where/what does the receiving mailserver check?

When using DKIM.. which domain DNS should contain the DKIM field? a. only the mailserver domain will suffice.. b. every domain hosted in mailenable should have their own DNS changed and DKIM installed in mailenable.. option 'a' will save an awfull lot of work and trouble.. with couple hundreds of do...

Hi, At the moment Mailenable works with a Default SSL Certificate selected via servers-localhost-properties-ssl where a list of certificates installed on the system resides.. These certificates need to be installed on the system by hand each time a certificate is renewed.. We work with a central cer...

isn't there a way to do this? a right mouse block option or something which moves the temp blocked ip's to fully blocked list?

or where is the location on disk of these temporarily blocked ip addresses?

or an option/setting to make this temp abuse block longer than an hour?

Navigate within the MailEnable installation path on the server to: Mail Enable\Config\Postoffices\(post office name)\MAILBOXES\(mailbox name)\Senders\Whitelist. Check if there are any files present and delete them. Chances are, that the mailbox whitelisted the address prior to disabaling the whitel...

You need to log into the web mail client for recipient xxxx/xxxx and navigate to the "Options" page. Expand the "Spam" node and click on "Whitelist" option. Check the list to see if the recipient has white listed the email address or domain. Hi Ian, thanks for the reply! I logged in via the webmail...

well it's great to have this many responses to this serious problem.. thanks! in addition to solving this very annoying problem (lets call it a bug) I went through the debug log.. which states: 05/15/19 13:44:58 ME-I0101: [1832] Whitelisted: Message from ([SMTP:example@domain.com]) has been whitelis...

Hi, The system messages are full of 'Temporarily blocked IP address x.x.x.x for abuse of [SMTP] with username xxx@xxx.xx Which is really nice, because it means its working.. ..BUT.. they return an hour later and they have another X attempts trying to hack the password of accounts.. I've search every...

Hi, I'm getting really sick and tired of this problem and really believe its a mailenable shortcoming. - I do not want to activate the 'authenticated users can spoof sender addresses', because that brought me all kinds of trouble with costumers who have specific software solutions which uses its own...

BETTER! thanks! Hi, It sounds like there are registry entries that are present for the old version of Enterprise. Open Windows regedit and navigate to: 32bit OS: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mail Enable\Mail Enable 64bit OS: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Mail Enable\Mail Enable If you see r...

I just installed version Pro 6.60.. but my version number keeps saying enterprise 3.63.. (When starting mailenable, looking at the system overview, and checking the diagnostic report..) I had enterprise 3.63 a long time ago and didnt think the version number would be important after downgrading and ...