Chocolatey makes every sysAdmin's life a thousand times easier by making server deployment an automated breeze. I BEG the MailEnable team to make and maintain Chocolatey packages of all "latest release" installs of ME. This would include previous V2, V3, V4, etc versions.
https://chocolatey.org/
Search found 835 matches
- Fri May 31, 2013 2:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Please consider making and maintaining Chocolatey install pk
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6853
- Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:24 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Fresh install on Server 2012. Cannot start IMAP
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4824
Re: Fresh install on Server 2012. Cannot start IMAP
Bah Humbug. I reinstalled ME and now all services started without issue.
- Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:28 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Fresh install on Server 2012. Cannot start IMAP
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4824
Fresh install on Server 2012. Cannot start IMAP
Actually, I can't start
- IMAP
- HTTPMail
- Management Service
- POP Connector
- Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:38 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Who is failing authentication?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6315
Re: Who is failing authentication?
It appears as though the failure is coming from ASSP 04/18/12 03:58:18 SMTP-IN 192557C935CC4A0A834928B699585D10.MAI 608 127.0.0.1 220 mx1.infinitasserver.com ESMTP MailEnable Service, Version: 5.51--5.51 ready at 04/18/12 03:58:18 0 0 04/18/12 03:58:18 SMTP-IN 192557C935CC4A0A834928B699585D10.MAI 60...
- Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:20 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Who is failing authentication?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6315
Re: Who is failing authentication?
ps: it looks like there's a spelling error in your debug string
form the IP address
- Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:17 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Who is failing authentication?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6315
Who is failing authentication?
I've got a debug log full of the following. 04/18/12 18:11:07 ME-E0125: Connection Refused: (127.0.0.1) was refused because there have been too many failed authentication attempts form the IP address. The problem is that the IP address is local (probably because I'm using the ASSP Proxy), and I'm no...
- Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:32 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Amazon EC2 Micro for ME Ent
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3788
Amazon EC2 Micro for ME Ent
I've moved the bulk of my clients to a different service, however I'm still hosting about 30 or 40 mail boxes with an average of 600 emails being processed daily.
Has anyone here used an Amazon EC2 Micro instance as a dedicated ME Ent box? If so, what have the results been? How does it perform?
Has anyone here used an Amazon EC2 Micro instance as a dedicated ME Ent box? If so, what have the results been? How does it perform?
- Thu Aug 25, 2011 1:33 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Published Calendar Disappearing Act
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3441
Published Calendar Disappearing Act
I'm trying to get my iCal.app to connect to my ME Calendar. I've "shared" the calendar folder I've successfully connected through Mac OS X Lion >> System Preferences >> Mail, Contacts & Calendars I can create an event in my iCal.app When I refresh/sync, I can see the event show up in ME Webmail When...
- Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:50 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: AJAX
- Replies: 6
- Views: 18648
Re: AJAX
You can upload via javascript, and you can now even drag/drop upload.
http://www.thecssninja.com/javascript/fileapi
http://valums.com/ajax-upload/
etc...
It's just that none of this is currently available in MailEnable.
http://www.thecssninja.com/javascript/fileapi
http://valums.com/ajax-upload/
etc...
It's just that none of this is currently available in MailEnable.
- Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:29 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Advanced SQL Config [Enterprise Only]
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14492
Re: Advances SQL Config [Enterprise Only]
I'd like to know if anyone ever used any of these triggers? There has been nearly 2000 views on this thread.
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:30 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Version 4 Webmail Demo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 17390
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:52 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Version 4 Webmail Demo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 17390
As I said before, I don't think that Telerik is the Be ALL and End ALL, but I do believe that it would seriously benefit the MailEnable Webmail. The existing editor is old and tired, whereas the RadEdtior is new and vibrant. Inline Spell Checking is one of the best features in that project, but even...
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:02 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Version 4 Webmail Demo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 17390
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:42 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Version 4 Webmail Demo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 17390
In my humblest opinion, that is an aweful idea. Without an enhanced editor, v4 will be as big of a webmail flop as v3. I'm not trying to offend you with compairing you to your competition (ST), but they have a far superior web ui in version 3, and they are now sitting on versoin 6. MailEnable has so...
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:43 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Version 4 Webmail Demo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 17390
Ok, so upon further examination, it looks as though the demo webmail IS the v4 webmail... just hasn't changed enough to be noticable. I was really excited about the v4 release because somewhere in my search for the addition of the Telerik RadEditor, someone from MailEnable said that it was in fact c...