(bump)
I am wondering if anyone else is experiencing the same issue.
Thanks!
Search found 14 matches
- Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:24 pm
- Forum: Error Reports and Issues
- Topic: Mac Mail vs MailEnable SMTP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9537
- Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:52 am
- Forum: Error Reports and Issues
- Topic: Mac Mail vs MailEnable SMTP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9537
Mac Mail vs MailEnable SMTP
I have encountered an issue with MailEnable and Mac Mail, not sure if anyone else has experienced the same issue (searched forum but can't find anything). We are using MailEnablle Professional 5.53 on one of our servers. It is hosting around 4,700 domains and 11,000 mailboxes without any issues. How...
- Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:11 am
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Need another port for SMTP SSL.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 33051
Re: Need another port for SMTP SSL.
Which version of MailEnable can this patch be applied to? Thx!
- Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:32 pm
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
hi someone_else, Is it Ok to set MTA pickup event > 1 (say 5) if using a VM Linux SA, instead of Win version SA? You mentioned something about that very early in this thread. Would any messages be NOT processed? We had experience with Win SA skipping messages with MTA > 5. Thanks in advance for your...
- Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:26 pm
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
Thanks for the reply. A note for other users running multiple scripts in a CMD file as your MTA event. The syntax should be: xxxxxxxxxxx.cmd ============= @echo off "C:\Program Files\orginalMTA.exe" %1 %2 "C:\Program Files\MESpamC\MESpamC.exe" %1 %2 ============= There are TWO arguments, not one. Re...
- Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:55 am
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
someone_else: Thanks for the clarification on the difference between the MeSpamc page and the pre-SA Content Page. It makes good sense. I found several other issues that are worth mentioning: 1) On the pre-SA content page, the " SkipSAForTheseDomains " takes domains as arguments. I tried with whitel...
- Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:57 pm
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
another follow up for the greater good... On MeSpamC page, there are 2 skipping fields: ++++++++ Skip processing for these domains Skip processing for these senders ++++++++ On Pre-SA Content page, there are also the 2 same skipping fields: ++++++++ Skip SA for these senders Skip SA for these domain...
- Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:29 pm
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
to follow up...... we will able to achieve the whitelist using the pre-SA tab's +++++++++++ Skip SA for these senders Skip SA for these domains +++++++++++ We are not sure what the difference is between the MEspamC Page Skipping and the Pre-SA content page skipping. The x-mespamc status shows a diff...
- Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:49 pm
- Forum: Third Party Applications
- Topic: MESpamC - MailEnable SpamAssassin Client [v 0.3.1 / 0.2.5]
- Replies: 164
- Views: 1290199
"skip processing for these senders" option
someone_else. First of all, thank you for all the effort. This is a great tool. I have everything running perfectly, except for the ""skip processing for these senders" option. The MESpamC version is 0.3.1.0, and I have tried entering the following in the "skip processing for these senders" field: +...
- Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:22 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Professional Edition
- Topic: Ordering of MTA Processes (CommandPickup, COM Event, Filter)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7522
We are wondering if the above described behaviour: ++++++++++++++++ now = MTA command line pickup event -> filter -> MTA COM object pickup event should be (if the process pickup after filter option is UNCHECK) = MTA pickup events (command line + COM) all processed -> filter ++++++++++++++++ is a bug...
- Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:55 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Professional Edition
- Topic: Ordering of MTA Processes (CommandPickup, COM Event, Filter)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7522
Ordering of MTA Processes (CommandPickup, COM Event, Filter)
Hi all, We are currently using MailEnable Professional 2.52 with Plesk 8.2. Plesk 8 has switched from using a command pickup event (memailfilter.exe) to a COM object event (pleskmemta.PleskMEMTA) for its mail processing. We wish to run some additional filtering using the MailEnable bulit-in Filter f...
- Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:33 am
- Forum: MailEnable Professional Edition
- Topic: Secure Webmail Problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6879
- Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:29 pm
- Forum: MailEnable Enterprise Edition
- Topic: Installed Hotfix ME-10025 - Now Postoffice Connector crashes
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12756
- Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:51 am
- Forum: MailEnable Professional Edition
- Topic: Reverse DNS
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10984