I properly also have to tell that I have an smtp proxy that receives the mail at port 25 and makes some changes to the mail header (and after that ships the mail to another port where MailEnable is listening): X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin xxx (xxxxxx) on xxxxx X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 req...

The checkbox that says "Include list of header field names" is checked (and was been all the time), so this means that my mail server via the h-tag (in the header) allows the receiving mail server to make changes in the header of my e-mails without getting a fail - right? And if so, then there is no...

Thanks for the check with yahoo groups - seems that they themselves are forgetting that they are using domainkeys. But it hits me, yahoo groups are - as the rest of the yahoo-servers – NOT running in test mode, therefore the fail. Otherwise it would have been a softfail. Yahoo shame on you :oops: ...

Looks like Yahoo Groups are having problems with thier own technology.

This was NOT a spam e-mail - it was a real yahoo-group mailout:

Thank you again

But why is the encrypted text of your public key not visible? See your own link.

And why does DKeyEvent not use the "n=A 1024 bit key;"-text in the public key like yahoo does? And what does n=A that yahoo has in its public key do?

So many questions

Ok, that expains it all... but then we (us mailenable people) also better not enforce and stop the testing? Right? Or?

Why is Yahoo not enforcing and also still in test-mode? One should think that they of all people had finished testing and also were enforcing.

http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch ... m&type=TXT

Thanx a lot

Hi someone_else 8) I get some strange errors when I send locally. The first is this where an e-mail is auto-forwarded to another local e-mail-address. The "selector revoked" error shows up more than hundred times in the header: Authentication-Results: xxxxx from=websend@XXXX.XXX; domainkeys=neutral...

Hi Mail Enable I have the latest beta version of the professional version installed and I have the latest version of F-prot (with the latest anti-virus-files) installed on my server, but it slips through no. 5, 19, 24 and 25 of the test viruses from: http://www.webmail.us/testvirus/ But F-prot on th...

There is no command line scanner for the newest version Norton Anti-virus (have asked them myself), but even if you had the command scanner of the older version Norton installed on your server, then it would still not find all of the test-viruses. I believe that it is a weakness in Mail Enable's MTA...

Yaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhooooooouuuuuuuuwwwwwwwww :-D The real spammers jump around a lot hijacking new mail server, but they do not that often change their web servers, because if they did people wouldn't reach to see they site, before they had moved and it is also harder for them to setup up new web ser...

The blacklists are already available for everyone and they are already being maintained professionally and Mail Enable is already using them, but Mail Enable is sadly only looking up the IP of the sending server and not the IP of the web server (and not a url) . Therefore, Mail Enable is not catchin...

I just downloaded it from the given url. The trail is lasting for 90 days!

I will look into the difference with the trail and the real version.