Strange "too busy" behaviour!

Discussion regarding the Standard version.
Post Reply
alberto
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:23 am

Strange "too busy" behaviour!

Post by alberto » Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:13 pm

When I send emails to some particular mail servers
I get alway a Message Delivery Delay

Code: Select all


MailEnable: Message delivery has been delayed.

Message is waiting at myserver.com for delivery to mx.domain.com

The message will be retried for another 24 hours.

Reason: Could not deliver this message to the remote host domain.com because the connection either failed or was refused. MailEnable will keep trying to deliver this message and will notify you of any progress.

Message headers follow:
....

This thing doesn't happen when I send emails from other mail servers
and the destination mail server administrator say that he doesn't have any problem into receiving emails.
[/code]

cszeto
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:06 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Post by cszeto » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:05 am

Microsoft MVP (2004 through 2008)

alberto
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:23 am

Post by alberto » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:22 am

The problem is different.

The remote server send back


2005-12-22 04:35:29 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx SMTP-OU mydomain.com 676 CONN MYSERVER 0 56
2719
2005-12-22 04:35:30 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx SMTP-OU mydomain.com 676 EHLO
220+smtp.domain.com+ESMTP+Service+(1.2.X-CM)+ready MYSERVER 24 80 156
2005-12-22 04:35:30 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx SMTP-OU mydomain.com 676 MAIL
EHLO+myserver.com 250-smtp.domain.com IARRUSSO 41 8 157
2005-12-22 04:35:31 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx SMTP-OU mydomain.com 676 RCPT
MAIL+FROM:<mymail@mydomain.com>+SIZE=1887 250+Ok MYSERVER 27 78 1375
2005-12-22 04:35:31 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx SMTP-OU mydomain.com 676 QUIT
RCPT+TO:<mail@domain.com>
450+<mail@domain.com>:+Recipient+address+rejected:+Too+Busy.+Try+again+later
MYSERVER 6 9 156


mydomain.com is receiving the system delivery message back from the remote server and it's different from the thread that you've pointed. Anyway thank you for the reply.

cszeto
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:06 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Post by cszeto » Mon Dec 26, 2005 11:15 am

The point of the quoted thread is that the latest 1.91 release does correct previous delivery issues. If you are on the latest 1.91 version, then you are right, it is not related.
Microsoft MVP (2004 through 2008)

Post Reply