Please kindly add back the default SpamAssassin headers

Post your MailEnable suggestions here.
Post Reply
poweredge
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 11:16 am

Please kindly add back the default SpamAssassin headers

Post by poweredge »

MailEnable removed the following SpamAssassin headers during the anti-spam process, and simply replaced with a customized header...actually I wonder what is the header ME replaced with if SpamAssassin result shows it's a Spam? Somehow I couldn't find this important information anywhere, thanks.

SpamAssassin detail header is very useful in determine exactly which test scored the highest mark. Without it, we have no way to see the insight of spam details.

The following is the original detail with SpamAssassin added headers.

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (svnunknown) * on win10 *
at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:52:31 +0800
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.4, hits=16.4, required=5.0, autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no, shortcircuit=no
X-Spam-Level: ****************
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
* [score: 0.5921]
* 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
* [123.235.203.28 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
* 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
* 3.3 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
* 1.0 RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 RBL: Listed in dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net (open
* relay/proxy/dialup)
* [IP 123.235.203.28 is UCEPROTECT-Level 1 listed.]
[See <http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=123.235.203.28>]
* 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
* bl.spamcop.net
* [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?123.235.203.28>]
* 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
* [123.235.203.28 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
* 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
* provider (newhopeglassmirror[at]domain.com)
* 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
* 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed
* (temperror)
* 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 0.5 JAM_LARGE_FONT_SIZE RAW: Body of mail contains parts with very
* large font
* 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
* https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
* [123.235.203.28 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
* 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted
* 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML
* tag
* 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
* 0.4 PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS High profile HELO with no sender rDNS
* 0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS From SPOOFED_FREEMAIL and no rDNS
* 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available.

In email header, all SpamAssassin headers were removed and simply.

X-PTR-Result: Generic, Fail
X-ME-Bayesian: 0.99500
X-ME-Spam: High (1050) <This is the final score calculated by ME anti-spam weighting system, which includes the test from SpamAssassin result as well.

Also found some similar posts.

http://www.mailenable.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43890
http://www.mailenable.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43508
Attachments
3.jpg
3.jpg (74.17 KiB) Viewed 18481 times

poweredge
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 11:16 am

Re: Please kindly add back the default SpamAssassin headers

Post by poweredge »

There is a possible solution to use a 3rd party ME MTA connector.
https://www.mailenable.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42673

but it's already way outdated, so I am hesitate to use it.
http://mailenable.exhalus.net/mespamc/download.asp

Any suggestion for solution, I also saw a few MTA pickup event add-on, but most of them are outdated, are they safe to be used with V10.34?
https://mailenable.com/addons_Filtering.asp

Brett Rowbotham
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 7:48 am
Location: Cape Town

Re: Please kindly add back the default SpamAssassin headers

Post by Brett Rowbotham »

I have used the MESpamC solution on my ME server for years now, still works for me in 10.34.

poweredge
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 11:16 am

Re: Please kindly add back the default SpamAssassin headers

Post by poweredge »

Brett Rowbotham wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:38 am
I have used the MESpamC solution on my ME server for years now, still works for me in 10.34.
Noted and many thanks for the confirmation.

Post Reply