Upgrading to 1.1?

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:07 pm

I notice today that there was a release (in July) of 1.1. Why isn't there a post to thise effect in the Announcements forum? I also never got an email that the new version was done.

Anyhow, what concerns should I have upgrading my 1.0 to 1.1? Should I just run the install?

Post by **MailEnable** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:22 pm

Products were announced via rss feed and mailout (but does not look like anything was posted to the forum by MailEnable). Also FYI: 1.2 is due for release within the next week... more bugfixes and improved performance.

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:32 pm

That's cool. I will wait instead of doing 2 upgrades. But what does the upgrade procedure look like?

Jon

Post by **MailEnable** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:19 pm

The upgrade procedure is to install over the existing.

Details/specifics are here:
http://www.mailenablecorp.com/kb/Conten ... D=me020040

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:49 pm

Is 1.2 out yet? Thought it would be just a week away from the first post here.

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:39 pm

"pht pht .. .is this thing on??"

haldrich98 · Post by **haldrich98** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:44 pm

csts · Post by **csts** » Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:56 am

rfwilliams777 · Post by **rfwilliams777** » Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:00 pm

I have not seen any mention of version 1.2 on the website. Is it due to be released?

We upgraded from version 1.04 to 1.1 and have seen noticeable improvements and so far have nothing but compliments. We, though, would really like as a benefit a spell checker for the webmail. Beyond that, we've enjoyed it and look forward to see the newer version out soon.

http://www.coveantdata.com ...Where data becomes information!

webafrica · Post by **webafrica** » Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:47 pm

it would be nice to have more feedback on upcoming releases

csts · Post by **csts** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:51 pm

Tell that to Microsoft, Symantec, (insert large software company name here).

I think the only real problem here is that they occasionally hint at new features, which get us excited and then impatient.
I'd rather they take the time to make the new releases as stable as possible, versus rushing them out.

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:49 pm

Exceptionally long "week" wait for the 1.2 release...sigh.

jglazer · Post by **jglazer** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:55 pm

TIck tock...I mean ... FOUR MONTHS!!! for what was supposed to be released "next week"????

mherman · Post by **mherman** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:39 pm

Please don't make them mad.......

kdehl113 · Post by **kdehl113** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:02 pm

And you were suprised why?

Upgrading to 1.1?

Upgrading to 1.1?

bump

Version 1.2