Missing function, in newest versions.
On http://www.mailenable.com/documentation ... sting.html it states:
Note: It is possible to configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist. This is configured in the administration program by selecting the White list button on the Reverse DNS Blacklisting tab under the properties of the SMTP Connector.
Missing function, Configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:44 am
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Re: Missing function, Configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist
Hi,
Yes this is misleading and incorrect. We will update the documentation accordingly. It should have been:
Note: It is possible to configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist. This is configured in the administration program navigating to the SMTP properties and selecting the "Whitelist" tab.
Yes this is misleading and incorrect. We will update the documentation accordingly. It should have been:
Note: It is possible to configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist. This is configured in the administration program navigating to the SMTP properties and selecting the "Whitelist" tab.
Regards,
Ian Margarone
MailEnable Support
Ian Margarone
MailEnable Support
Re: Missing function, Configure a white list that will override the reverse DNS blacklist
Any way to create an override filter rule, for example.
FilterResult=0
If CriteriaMet([ME_HEADERS_CONTAIN],"X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000") AND _
CriteriaMet([ME_SPF],"Pass") Then
([REMOVE HEADER]), "X-ME-Content: Deliver-To=Junk")
FilterResult=1
End If
Action, deliver to inbox
If you could do this the false positive rate on ME filters would be basically non existent.
FilterResult=0
If CriteriaMet([ME_HEADERS_CONTAIN],"X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000") AND _
CriteriaMet([ME_SPF],"Pass") Then
([REMOVE HEADER]), "X-ME-Content: Deliver-To=Junk")
FilterResult=1
End If
Action, deliver to inbox
If you could do this the false positive rate on ME filters would be basically non existent.